Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd (2003) - Comedy

Hohum Score



Set back in the 80s when Harry met Lloyd in high school where they cross paths with a mean principal and a bunch of other outcasts much like themselves.

IMDB: 3.4
Director: Troy Miller
Stars: Derek Richardson, Eric Christian Olsen
Length: 85 Minutes
PG Rating: PG-13
Reviews: 69 out of 266 found boring (25.93%)

One-line Reviews (119)

I left the theater after about 20-25 minutes into this film.

The original "Dumb and Dumber" was a silly but mildly enjoyable film (I just rewatched it).

One of the worst movies I've seen in the last 12 months bar none.

This movie is the first movie I have ever walked out of.

From the distasteful (a scene in which Harry appears to smear faeces on a bathroom wall) to the downright confusing (a not so funny `your it' sequence in a convenience store).

Worse still, unlike the original movie, the ending is incredibly predictable.

There is no story line to speak of.

This has to be the most pointless film of 2003 and one of the least funniest as well.

Wow, what a bore.

I would say it's about 25% as engaging as the original.

An enjoyable comedy.

Don't waste your time or money, even when it comes out on DVD.

It was the biggest waste of 2 hours (That felt like 10) and the money I spent to go see it!

It's a fun movie that's easy to watch, especially if you're bored.

No original comedy, no plot, no character development, nothing that could even be considered comedy.

This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

" I almost walked out of the theatre.

When I left the theater, there was a unanimous vibe coming from the audience that screamed "I can't believe I just wasted 90 f***ing minutes and $8.75 on such a loathsome trash heap of a movie!!!!!!!!

It was very entertaining.

As for the film itself,there are one or two riotously funny moments,but these are,unfortunately,on the balancing end of the scales,with some tired and easily predictable gags unfortunately on the tipping end.

Waste of Money .

All in all, this movie is a complete waste of time and money for the cinema patron.

Save your money.

In the hands of the Farrellys, Dumb And Dumberer might have made for an intriguing project, as those auteurs are often able to inject a degree of engagement into the most outrageous scenario.

Totally pointless and all I can say is I am proud I never saw it in the theater or spent a sent to watch it.

Avoid this, it's the worst movie of the year.

As stated earlier, the film takes place in 1986, yet the settings are more bland than a packet of 3 year-old Tang.

Not that there should be a great plot in these types of movies, but this one went nowhere.

Derek Richardson is wonderful as Harry, and does a great Daniels impression, he was hilarious, had brilliant chemistry with Olsen, also had some great makeup, and was just very enjoyable to watch I loved him.

Also an exciting car chase.

Harry and Lloyd just really get in the way of the plot and you begin to want them to leave any of the scenes they are in.

It gets incredibly aggravating because the stupidity of the characters makes the movie move in a slow pace and even though its a mere 86 minutes it feels way longer.

This film is nothing but a pure rip-off, disappointment of the year, a complete waste of time, and even if you loved the first Dumb&Dumber movie, you'll even hate the original after watching this sequel (or rather, prequel).

With terrible acting, no story, horrible jokes, toilet humor and utterly disgusting events, this movie is something that should have priority on everyone's avoid list.

I was very disappointed by this movie I wanted to leave the theater early because this movie wasn't even funny at all.

Save your money so you won't be writing a review like mine.

Dumb and Dumberer is the prequel to the original smash hit with Jim Carey, The second stars Derek Richardson and Eric Olsen with Eugene Levy playing a very entertaining role.

Its very entertaining.

Don't waste your time or money, even when it comes out on DVD.

Easily one of the worst movies ever made.

This was by far the worst sequel and arguably the worst movie of all time.

triumphing in its apparent goal to challenge "Plan 9 From Outer Space" for the title of the worst movie ever made.

I had this whole plan of how I was going to ruin it for everyone by laughing way too hard at jokes that were really unfunny, just to make everyone turn and look at me and think "what's wrong with you", and repeat back lines that weren't witty at all, adding "that's so funny" and etc. Well, my little game got boring fast.

After twenty minutes of the movie, I was so annoyed and bored with the movie that I walked out.

Then you get a story going nowhere My half hour was spent without a single chuckle; I might have moaned once or twice from indigestion.

A definite candidate for the worst movie of the year.

If you have seen this movie some of you might of thought that it was good, but if you ask me this is the worst movie since Little Nicky.

But, despite being historically incorrect and having major editing issues, the film was still full of laughs and ends up being an enjoyable way to spend an hour and twenty minutes.

Unfortunately this movie was just plain boring and not very humorous.

Worst Movie Ever.

Yawner and snooze is continued.

This is the worst movie I have ever seen, besides 'Sugar and Spice'.

This is quite possibly the single worst movie Ive ever seen and I saw Freddy Git Fingered, ok?

Anyway I give props to the actors too, they did a great job, over all a cute entertaining movie.

This might qualify as the worst movie ever made.

Plotless movies lead to very short summaries, much like this one...

I saw this movie on Friday, and it was as huge waste of money as well as a huge dissapointment.

) It's enjoyable though there are some eye-roller moments.

Other enjoyable performances come from Brian Posehn, the store clerk, and Michelle Krusiec as Ching Chong.

The "jokes" in this movie are predictable and dumb.

Such subtle, visual comedy is rare in a film the main highlight of which otherwise is the unexpected lesbian kiss by the delectable Jessica - which, for a brief moment, introduces a sensibility miles away from the childishness of the main action.

The jokes, if there were any, were boring and foreseeable.

This movie was kind of a waste of my time, but then again I wasn't doing anything constructive at the time anyway.

The jokes were shallow, predictable, and weren't even funny.

)Some guy feel asleep in the theatre I was watching it and and began to snore.

Only completists will want to waste their time on this nonsense.

It has been a popular and critical disaster from the day it was released, and while it's true that it is simply a bad, bad movie, I think that anyone claiming it to be 'absolutely THE worst movie I've EVER seen' might be exaggerating just a little bit.

But most of all, Eric Christian Olsen plays Lloyd perfectly and his performance alone is worth the watch.

Not only were the jokes unfunny, but the movie was so boring.

No story,no acting, no brains, no heart, no comedy - only waste of time and money for everyone.

The acting is terrible, the plot is horrendously absurd and predictable, and it is just not uplifting to watch.

This is quite possibly the worst movie i have ever paid to go and see.

I really only remembered only one funny scene, and the rest of the movie was pointless comedy, (If it is even called comedic).

It is not even "dumb funny", it is just boring and was a big mistake from the beginning.

I would rather have a root canal without anesthesia than sit through this hunk of garbage, which I rated as the #1 worst movie of 2003, ever again.

It has no plot and basically drags on for a while.

Despite the likeable gormlessness of Harry (Derek Richardson) and Lloyd (Eric Christian Olsen) in the main roles, his film mostly falls flat, with most of the humour either being too limp or too predictable to make much of an impact.

Full and empty at the same time: Empty of humour and plot yet full of offence (amongst other things).

So only watch this movie if you are really (and I mean REALLY) bored!

This is possibly the worst movie ever made in the history of man.

I left the theater half way through the movie because it was so bad.

in its own way, its goofy, fun, and enjoyable.

I found this movie quite entertaining, and it definitely gave my room mate and I some great laughs.

Worst Movie Ever .

This movie is a complete waste of time!!!

This film had too be one of the most unnecessary, pointless(and plot less for that matter)films I have ever seen.

It was boring and simply unfunny.

Worse still, unlike the original movie, the ending is incredibly predictable.

This was the worst movies I have ever seen ( Close first to Napoleon Dynamite)!

There was basically no story, and the only part that I laughed at was a scene where Bob Saget makes a cameo.

This is the worst movie I have ever seen.

Stick to the more 'straight comedies' such as Legally Blonde (ZZZZZZZ!!

As stated earlier, the film takes place in 1986, yet the settings are more bland than a packet of 3 year-old Tang.

It was a complete waste of time and money and I strongly recomend not seeing it.

The principal is an actor who has proven himself in other comedies but this time he can't even act up to the poor script, lame jokes and boring storyline.

I went to see this movie not expecting much because it wasnt the original actors( Carey,Daniels) but i really enjoyed it.


Bob Sagat does make the movie enjoyable for the 20 seconds he's in it.

Far and Away the Worst Movie I've Seen .

He has a gratingly monotone voice and a face you would like to hit.

all time worst movie award .

With that said, this was possibly the worst movie I have ever seen in my life.

So i dragged my brother to see it.

I give it a 10 out of 10 because I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Their roles are small and uninteresting.

The worst movie ever made.

Don't waste your time, your money, or your disk space for this sad excuse for a comedy.

Sure Harry and Llyod were all right, but Eugene Levy was wasted and not a single thing he said was ever funny, Cheri Oteri was boring and both of them together were on the screen too much to be enjoyed.


Nuff SaidUnless your younger than 8 years old, avoid this movieA lame 3/10 (it only scored this high because my son enjoyed it, he's out grown it now though at age 9)

Apart from that "Dumb and Dumberer" can be summed up by the fact that I actually got up off my couch to remove this ultra-boring, ultra-unfunny piece of cinematic spam from the DVD player.

The story revolves around a loony principal and his bunch of empty headed students.

Who dragged Bob Saget into this thing?

But, despite being historically incorrect and having major editing issues, the film was still full of laughs and ends up being an enjoyable way to spend an hour and twenty minutes.

Stupid with no plot .

This was a complete waste of time, two hours of my life wasted.

Not as great as the first, but I enjoyed it .

The movie is pointless!

You might then get some enjoyment out of an otherwise bland film.