Glass (2019) - Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller

Hohum Score



Security guard David Dunn uses his supernatural abilities to track Kevin Wendell Crumb, a disturbed man who has twenty-four personalities.

IMDB: 6.7
Director: M. Night Shyamalan
Stars: James McAvoy, Bruce Willis
Length: 129 Minutes
PG Rating: PG-13
Reviews: 227 out of 1000 found boring (22.7%)

One-line Reviews (614)

The settings are also quite intriguing as the mental institution has a vibe of insanity, isolation and secrecy.

One of the worst movies I have ever seen.

Is this movie worth watching?

I really enjoyed it all the way through.

Waste your time if you'd like.

Since the story has been dull all along, the plot twist becomes so meh.

Far Too Slow .

I'd like to summarize the movie in a simple statement: "2 hours of slow, boring prelude for a weak ending and predictable twist.

Dull .

In summary, Glass seemed a confusing mess to me and my movie theatre-working friend.

However both of these are spoiled by the very slow developing storyline and somewhat cryptic script.

Save your money !

This is what superheroes would be like if they existed in the real world, not the avengers and superman overpowering, overwhelming and cliche powers.

What a waste of time...

Sarah Paulson is fine, her character is bland.

Samuel L Jackson plays the complicated title character Dr Glass, very well, adding the same levels of unexpected moves from Glass, that give the film its ultimate Shaymalam famous twists.

Slow Middle...

For this reason, I would not deem it to be a classic, but an enjoyable experience nonetheless.

James McAvoys absolutely stunning performance.

Until we realized that generations have been indoctrinated by propaganda promulgated by establishment institutions seeking to uphold their own vested interests at the expense of social and ecological well-being, until we woke up to the fact that we had been taught an upside-down view of the world, until we understood that the criminal is just like anyone of you surviving under more difficult circumstances, only then could the ANTI-HERO's story be told.

There are a couple of short, uneventful fight scenes, with no outcome...

Split was brilliant, original and enjoyable?

There is not, one, not two, but three twists at the end; one of them I found really contrived and lame.

Sure,this type of storytelling is rather hitchcockian, but at least it's extremely engaging.

Highly recommend it for anyone who is a fan of M.

The movie Glass emerges as meaningful and intellectual compelling.

Unfortunately I found the final result quite boring, superhero's with mild superpowers, rooted in the real world, just aren't interesting.

The movie was so slow and kept making me think that there was more, so much more, after all this build up I thought I was going to get a mind blowing ending.

The fight scenes in here are rather drab.

I really enjoyed it!

To say that I became immersed in it, is an understatement.

This "movie" I can describe as a boring, horrible, stupid mess.

A movie with some good performances and intriguing ideas that would have been pretty good if it had had a decent ending .

Amazing intense dramatic events with mind blowing ideas.....

Good, but kinda predictable.

I looked forward to this , it's a slow burn and set the premise for a masterpiece.

Boring .

Maybe if we saw some unusual people watching it, people that have some sort of mundane version of a super power, and get inspired, the ending would have more impact.

Although, James Mcavoy makes the movie worth watching.

The movie started off well but thought it dragged out a fair bit in the middle.

The movie began very intense and the Actor James McAvoy started on different personalites, which he did quite good.

It doesn t follow the usual structure of a superhero movie, which would be ok except it just feels awkward, stagnant, nonsensical and dull at many points.

It was such a waste of time and of all the directions this film could have gone, it chose an awful one.

I enjoyed very much until the End: I expected more from Shyamalan than creating a "background force" cliche ending.

What begins with a solid story line takes a dive into an empty finish.

Glass was boring with no more than a few fight scenes, all poorly filmed in some kind of weird first-person style which made no sense.

I still like Unbreakable more but I would say that this was slightly better than Split only because that one dragged on a bit too long.

Unexpected .

This is one of the kind, which braking boring box office formula that trending.

Yet for all that, I thought this was a compelling story with a phenomenal performance by McAvoy, who positions himself as a contender for the role of a 'real' super-hero villain at some point down the road.

The Movie sets in on a thrilling Moment & keeps its Momentum until the very End.

Underwhelming closure to an unexpected cinematic universe .

THE WORST movie i ever watch..totally bad storyline

The narrative structure of Glass is divided into fragmented flashbacks and an unpredictable turn of events that inspire more meaning to the title.

This movie is very slow and very boring.

Fight scenes were boring and no matter how good McAvoy was as his character it just seemed to be too much of him changing personalities.

Music is what made it suspenseful.

Worth watching, what you expect from the movies

It was far too disjointed.

That's the thing with Glass, it's at its most interesting and engaging when it plays with expectations and meets expectations.

Painfully slower.

It may seem like a superhero story but plays with the cliché to an interesting twist.

It is still a slow burn film, just like unbreakable, which I enjoyed because I loved the style that unbreakable brought.

The end could have been better, exciting and interested.

The movie goes on and on like this and becomes rather tedious.

Very enjoyable.

I love this film, thoroughly enjoyable and held out attention throughout.

"Glass" is slower.

Enjoyable throughout the entire movie.

The second act is my biggest flaw with this movie, it was super slow, and confusing.. like how Glass is getting out of his cage?

By comparison, Mr. Glass and David Dunn appear dull and dreary.

It was really a waste of time.

don´t waste your time watch "split" instead (same director)sorry

If I had been in the movie theater I would have walked out.

Beginnings a bit slow...

If they were all three then it did the job very disjointed.

Don't waste your time.

Utterly disjointed to the point it feels like plots were started and then dropped?

Fell asleep half way through the movie unfortunately.

It is clever that Shyamalan's addition to the Superhero Universe trend is as self-aware and meta as any sequel to Unbreakable should be, but all that stuff can get trite as well.

fell asleep for a bit...

To M Night Shyamalan I say, if you hate super hero movie fans so much, stop trying to be controversial and stylish and go bore off and direct something I won't waste time watching.

The dialogue is dreadful, the pacing is bizarre, and the overall scenery is watered-down to the point of being boring.

A nostalgic and enyojable conclusion to an unexpected trilogy .

The last act of the 3 part trilogy, which is a wonderfully unexpected gem of a trilogy and is only so upon the final films completion.

Disappointing slow ride to an unspectacular finish.

I'm my opinion they got Glass badly wrong, what's slated for being dull and flawed is actually a terrific movie.

The 2nd act is slower ( not a bad thing) and tries to more complex than it is.

One of most boring and pathetic movie ever .

There is to much going on , very confusing and extremely long and dragged out .

I am obviously missing the point, as so many people seem amazed by the movie.. How much Split impressed me, this movie has completely bored me.

Pointless .

This would be fine if it was more interesting, but after a promising opening, the middle felt flabby and repetitive and the ending fell flat.

Great actors, low-budget, boring story line.

I found it deeply boring.

I actually really enjoyed it for its deep meaning and how the director reflected the whole superheroes genre into real life scenarios.

It's just boring.

Glass half empty...

Don't waste your time.

Don't waste your money or time.

Dull .

Great Acting Bruce is Back On the edge of me seat from start to finsh

I enjoyed the slow pacing.

Every time he is on screen it's fun and exciting.

So in the end, Glass is a film that is worth experiencing in the theatre and it may not be the best M Night Shyamaln film, but it's still worth the watch.

The only good thing about this movie was that i fell asleep after 15 minutes and woke up 5 minutes before it ended.

Tedious and Silly .

Glass is a slow burner like its predecessors.

Original and Engaging.

The Camera Work & Editing is stunning and the Actors are, just as you can expect absolutely gorgeous and outstanding.

The universe created with Glass, Split, and Unbreakable are almost better than the Marvel or DC universe movies, if you ask me, just because they're more realistic, but they really better stick to the realistic superheroes approach, and keep it high quality, or they're just going to end up being the same as Marvel and DC movies, which I think people are getting used to (I don't want to say getting tired of, since they've gotten better and are enjoyable too, like Ant Man and Deadpool).

The story feels both empty and crowded.

For this film to be worth watching at all, I recommend you watch Unbreakable and Split first.

Split's script was written around the same time as Unbreakable so the script itself had a lot of that shamallama charm, the cinematography on the other hand felt lowkey generic, especially after watching Unbreakable right beforehand, but it was still entertaining and James McAvoy did an amazing job and truly felt possessed by multiple different people.

But the movie it's so boring.

Incredibly boring - felt like a waste of time .

Overall, Glass is a stunning psychological movie that kept the audience latched on until the end.

The plot twists were unexpected and very strong so that the movie goer understood how it all fit in.

Waste of time .

This movie is mind blowing, I mean it has been a long time since I have seen such an AMAZING movie, this is really a movie that is made by a super human mind indeed, the cast and the director of the movie made such an intelligent masterpiece, the movie was unpredictable, It was really the best movie I have watched in a really long long time.

There is a beginning, middle and end to every story, but with Superheroes there is a particular formula that's generally more evocative of childhood fantasies and wish fulfillment, making for exaggerated situations and unbelievable showdowns.

That little ending to "Split" with David Dunn showing up was cool and unexpected and it served its purpose.


In reality, I found this film dull, with very limited story and plot lines, overly lengthy speeches, and a terrible ending.

too slow too boring and no action at all

I was just expecting something more shocking and entertaining really.

Very good movie confusing end .

Jackson) is being held in a psychiatric ward and him being so heavily medicated to dull his intellect made some sense to me.

For those who haven' seen those 2 I'd think the whole story will be somewhat confusing though?

The dialogue seems like it was written by a 7-year-old, the characters are bland and severely lack complexity, the script is LAUGHABLE.

This movie entertains for starting 5 mins , after that it gets boring and pathetic and nothing happens in the movie .


Very very very.. boring(

" Overall I guess I enjoyed it.

However the story just drug on too long and was very boring with a few exciting things thrown in.

Waste of time .

Pure drivel and boring beyond belief.


Every other scene I rolled my eyes because the movie approached everything in the most cliche and superficial way possible.

Despite its flaws, however, Glass was an overall satisfying film that brought to the table many great interactions and intriguing themes, along with a great sense of care from M.

Hopefully, when I watch it with a full caffeine load, I can stay awake long enough to reach the parts of the movie that are supposedly phenomenal.

One of the worst movies I've ever seen .

This is not even a movie, just a long boring trailer

James Mackavoy is always is a delite and his acting is always very entertaining to watch.

Waste of time and money, no point in the movie, long and boring

A fighting scene really make me feel goosebump (from exciting) that i didn't feel it in other movies for a long time.

My advice: don't waste your time on this, even if they offer it for free.

Twists and twisted action packed.

Director really good n unpredictable especially the ending !!

My wife fell asleep watching this as it was just frustrating and embarrassing to watch characters behave this way even in a fictitious world.

The super feats were mostly a few cheap lifting of heavy things; cheap tossing scenes; cheap bang into solid structures leaving dents, etc. The introduction of a psychologist as superpower naysayer was interesting at first but soon got weaker as a bland character w/repetitive weak arguments against superhero traits.

But other than that, the movie gets super boring, Poulson was PATHETIC as the psychiatrist (really, The Purge levels of pathetic acting).

One of The worst movies I have seen in a long time.

Still, a very entertaining and enjoyable movie that I would recommand watching !

Some might say that she was needed in order to show that the Beast could be better, could be controlled and etc. However, this could have been achieved in other ways, much more entertaining ways.

Suspenseful Watching .

The worst movie I've ever seen.

Such a let down, worst movie I've seen in a while.

On the upside, the movie's saved by James McAvoy, who's superb as Kevin and all his personalities once again, a slightly exciting score by West Dylan Thordson - who blatantly borrows "Split" compositions, - a commendable, delicate resolution by Shyamalan and a third act so well executed that it'll surely leave you speechless, something that, in one way or another, the filmmaker keeps doing masterfully.

The previous films are thrilling, psychological observations of the human psyche in the superhuman form within two separate stories.

The plot jumped around too much and was hard to follow.

It's just that Glass also has contrived plot conveniences a plenty (the hospital is remarkably understaffed when it needs to be and the twist makes us question why certain characters are explicitly allowed to walk the Earth without receiving a Rick Dicker treatment), tonal issues, and clunky expository dialogue.

The Beast and Dunn are given a resolution the feels confusing considering everything they were put through.

Honestly, probably the worst part of the movie it's the slow writing.

I'm happy to have this movie in my collection and I highly recommend it.

I think we've become so use to fast paced action that when a film like this comes along we always want more.

Sometimes, cinema delivers the perfect unexpected trilogy - just ask Richard Linklater, who masterminded the Before series.

It is boring.

Not M Night Shyamalan's best work, but still entertaining.

I kinda understand what Shyamalan was going for, and this wouldn't be as off-putting for me as it was if David had a compelling character arc that lead to this, or if he simply had more to contribute to the overall narrative.

The idea of these three characters coming to a head, the best, the hero, and the villain are what made this movie confusing movie better.

Personally, I enjoyed it for the ideas it tries to convey and the very limited budget M.

In the beginning, the film felt slow, then during the middle, it felt fast paced, then back to slow paced near and during the ending.

Worth watching again.

Waste of time

Don't quite get the 'surprising ending' idea, it's entirely predictable and very much a follow on from the fore runner movies.

Having them finally face off in a "fight" that shows how little "superpower" they have is just dull.

Having not seen Unbreakable, or split, glass maybe a bit confusing for some.

Feels B and empty.

And boring.

From there the story begins to walk along a convoluted path that will only make sense towards the final stretch, but which is still enjoyable.

The actors and actresses did an amazing job, but the storyline is confusing.

Let me start by saying that Unbreakable was te worst movie I ve ever seen in the cinema.

Like I said, it is entertaining, definitely - and perhaps it will please the audiences who are used to the almost shallow plots of superhero movies.

Seen this film a couple of weeks ago when it first came out and I found the film intriguing and also really good.

Or if you are like me and like split but think unbreakable is way too slow then you'll leave with mixed feelings.

Save your money.

It's not about people wearing spandex costumes, flying all over the universe destroying half the world (especially America) in the name of saving the world, with mind blowing & rhetoric VFX and having melodramatic sacrificial theme at the end.

If Glass had a decent ending I would give it a 7, because in spite of some slow bits I enjoyed it.

Yawn .

It let me with an empty feeling, like I needed to see more.

Jackson) is still just as crafty; and adding to that, an unpredictable, Kevin Wendell Crumb as the final puzzle piece to that interesting gathering the first trailer promised is quite fulfilling.

I love Hollywood movies but hate how most of them are predictable, because no one dares to leave that bitter taste at the ending.. Reviews will stink and cry babies will shout demanding alternatives.

Tedious build up to anti-climax .

A little slow at times, but there are some exciting scenes and McAvoy gives a very entertaining performance.

It was incredibly original, riveting in the sense that there was a subtlety of mystery in the storyline.

Every Scene has meaning and they didnt waste any time with unnecessary Digressions.

I had expected there to be more action in Glass because each character had previously had intense action in the previous movies.

A Glass half empty .

Very drawn out and got boring long before the half way mark of the movie.

The action scenes are few (that's by design) but the movie fails to compensate and some of the scenes in the hospital come off as unnecessary or boring.

The final shock being very confusing and leaves you with a feeling of wanting more.

I like other films from this director/producer and was so positivebut this had no story at all.

Complex characters and a fast paced story make this final chapter a worthy conclusion.

Nothing happens and the end is a big anti climax.


The exposition of the movie is brilliant, the rising action is promising leading to a tense climax but the falling action is disappointing and the resolution simply uninteresting.

Too many stars acting and ending with a incomprehensible and boring movie.

nothing happens, poor story like, where was the son when his dad was being drowned?!

And so we'll continue to get bad thrillers, action and superhero movies full of CGI, pointless explosions, and boring, by-the-numbers, sequel-hinting storytelling everyone wants - and cynical shareholders will continue to get richer while creative filmmakers see their opportunities dwindle.

Poor script, poor effects, bizarre storyline and worst of all boring.

And though there are a few shortcomings & mishaps along the road, the film as a whole is way better, gripping & more interesting than what the general consensus is designating it to be.


I will admit that the "twist" in Glass is relatively satisfying and wholly unexpected.

Break the cliche .

Boredom at Ravenhill Memorial .

Night Shyamalan who Wrote and Directed Unbreakable and Split and now He finally has a unexpected trilogy which fans didn't think was going to happen when Split came out in 2017 and Shocked Audiences with the reveal that Split is connected to the Unbreakable Universe and Were finally going to See Bruce Willis Character David Dunn and Samuel L Jackson's Mr Glass.

While the plot unfolds towards its gut-wrenching climax, Shyamalan elevates the most mundane scene with odd angles, the use of color, and games of light and shadow.

I was absolutely in love with this whilst watching it, everything added up, it was enjoyable, everything g was going in the right direction, original actors playing the same characters, story was good Mcavoy was just amazing, everything was going great!

I found it fairly tense and engrossing throughout.

It's different, intriguing and quite dark compared to more known installments.

Unfortunately the problem I had with Glass is the pacing issues as the first ten minutes I feel were pointless.

A boring walkout experience .

Glass is ineptly paced and written, with broadly drawn supporting characters, too-obvious motives leading to a predictable "twist," a lack of suspense, and virtually no payoff.

The supporting characters in this film seem very shoehorned in and have very little plot significance.

Waste of TIME .

Waste of time.

Unfortunately Glass is slow, uninteresting and makes a mockery of Mr Glass (Samuel L Jackson).

The movie is senseless, and for the movie-goer its a waste of time and money.

Night Shyamalan Release Date: January 18th, 2019 (US) Runtime: 2hrs 9minsPros: Solid first act - Shyamalan's directing - Excellent performances from Willis, McAvoy & Jackson - Kevin's expanded multi-personality presentation Suspenseful action Sleek choreography West Dylan Thordson's slowburn musicCons: Jumbled final act - David Dunn's minor appearance in the last hour - Twist lacks surprise - Annt-climatic final battle -Short Thoughts: A someone who's not been favourable the Shyamalan over the past years, his latest work, Glass, did not leave me in baffling disappointment like Split, although I wasn't really anticipating this movie much.

From McAvoy's incredible performance, to a great background score, and an engaging screenplay.

It made me feel incredibly bored, even so much that after a very long time I felt the urge to leave the cinema in the middle of the movie.

All about trauma, identity control and cultural elitism, it has as much intriguing philosophizing as it does action.

Waste of time .

Glass is an fun, enjoyable, dopey, psychological thriller.

The major twists are unexpected and the ending is inspirational and makes you wonder what people are truly capable of.

Instead, Shyamalan employs the use of interminable drawn out Average Shot Lengths (ALS) with his ALS striking comparison with films circa 1940 to the 1960's.

We're talking about Shyamalan, a name attached to both bewilderment and surprise; for better or worse, "Glass," a film I followed carefully throughout the production, is not the first disappointment of the year, but it does be the most bittersweet yet entertaining ride a movie buff will have in the first two months of this new year.

If it was at all: the dialogues are so bland that you fall asleep under them, the ending would be nice if there were not one and a half hours in front of her in front of her.

The slow pace and highly intentional camera work make for a very entreating character study.


The first hour or so was quite solid in terms of quality, the premise is well set, it's groundend and believable, stylish and most of all entertaining, then comes the cliff dive.

It's a compelling watch all the way to the end because of them.

Bringing McAvoy's multiple personas together with Bruce Willis's character (David Dunn) and Samuel L Jackson's Elijah Price (Mr Glass) was unexpected and intriguing.

His ideas are compelling and perhaps he needs to collaborate with someone who can give his work a more critical pass before it moves to production.

To be fair to the movie, my rating came immediately after waking up in the middle of it, because it is so mundane and plodding that it will easily put a viewer to sleep unless properly prepared.

Great Cinematography of a HORRIBLE - absurd - S L O O O W moving - BORING film.

Then the final act was action packed and really good up until the end, which I didn't care for.

Mind blowing!

The plot twist is good, and unexpected.

Other than that the story was a bit slow and not enough of action with the main characters.

Please leave your Hollywood mindset at the door when you watch this and enjoy it for what it is: an entertaining movie that was well made and executed.

Boring .

While watching the prolix, dark-hued Glass, I felt underwhelmed, under embellished and at times bored.

Not to mention such lame, typical Hollywood cliché scenes..The only positive point was McAvoy's amazing performance.

It did keep my interest but it is a long movie and slow at times.

This movie is an unfocused, boring mess.

I get why it was created the way it was but it was slow and a little boring.

Not happy, what a bland mess, people dont talk like exposition flows out of their mouth M.

This is one of the movies that you walk out of the theater and you're still digesting the film.

For a thriller, we went in expecting far more action and thrill, but sadly it was mostly talking for the first hour and, at times was filled with confusing silent moments between characters that felt empty and did not add to the suspense at all.

It seemed rather slow in the beginning.

Story is gripping and gets your attention until you see the final act.

Boring plot.

Confusing if you have not seen the previous films.

This film was fair, it was entertaining.

Why an empty hospital for hours after Darryl gets killed?

Samuel L Jackson, implausibly already 70, is a welcome return as comic-obsessed mastermind Elijah Price, whose Machiavellian schemes make for an intriguing superpower.

The thronged masses in the train station at the end, staring numbly at their electronic devices, being exposed to the presence of something unpredictable and dangerous that's been hiding under their very noses - is that us?

It's all really pretty decent, really, and enjoyable more often than not.

The first 30-45 minutes it felt to me like it was a bit dull.

This movie is just unbearable...

However, after really absorbing and thinking about the ending and realizing what M.

but am fine with that if the script was okay..two small examples even I can make 10000 examples about how silly this movie is Samuel Jackson mom is same age as him in the movie..he is on wheelchair but how he managed to wear a tuxedo David and the beast fight in a water tank inside it looked huge but when it was breaking down the tank is same size as one I have on the roof Scenario oh well that's the longest boring dialogue i had to encounter So at the end one hero is killed by a sniper sitting on a veggie van painted to look like a cop van and the other was drawn in a water hole by some guy while his son watching with two cops from far and only came to rescue after ..blend movie am outrageous about the fake reviews here.. tomatoes gave it 35% please save ur hard earning money..we should sue that lazy director

A ponderous piece of ****

I expected the slow burn and liked the twist, despite M.

Entertaining again .

Glass is a different kind of superhero movie, intriguing, dramatic, unexpected.

The combat feels very boring and reminds me a lot of early 2000s superhero flicks like fantastic 4 and Elektra.

Anyhow, the problem were the several plot holes, a few minors and a few majors; the poor cinematography with the constant POV which I believe were meant to immerse the viewer but all it did for me was the opposite; the very poor writing with cliché bad nurse who abuses impaired patients, repetitive and unnecessary dialogue; badly directed and hardly believable fight scenes and some other directing issues.

What "Glass" does so well is expand the universe and brings this amazing set of cult classics to a satisfying and unexpected conclusion.

Most boring 2 hours of my life.

As the movie progresses however, it loses some of its atmosphere, creativity and wit as the film turns from a psychological thriller into an action film where the fascinating three main characters are degraded to superheroes that could come straight out of the uninspired, repetitive and stereotypical Marvel universe.

No action, no fight scene, boring drama, build up for nothing

It was just SO BORING !!!

The movie is slow paced,very short budget, and i wasn´t expecting a MCU movie, i am an unbrekable fan.

Embrace yourself, because it gets totally thrilling after every drama scene.

The first two-thirds builds an intriguing atmosphere, despite spending too much time pondering the question of what it would be like if superheroes really existed (doesn't every superhero film tackle this in one form or another?

This movie starts slow, and doesn't accelerate its tempo at any point.

Willis do the exact same boring guy as usual, the man is a pain to watch for so long now, most of his films are just bait and here more than ever.

Nothing happens in all the movie (although that's not bad), it's really slow, it cooks slowly and it's the best part (unless we are thinking that), but suddenly everything goes to hell in the final act when it started to go up level, TERRIBLE, suddenly a sect appears that wants to destroy superhumans, it doesn't matter if you're good or bad (every good part is in the trailers and clips).

Fantastic acting by the cameleon James McAvoy.. wasted on nonsense story.. this movie was boring i had to SPLIT it in 3 parts.

Worst movie .

In conclusion I would recommend Glass to anyone who has seen unbreakable and split as it is an enjoyable watch if you know the entire story.

The plot is really dull.. nothing happens 'til last 20 mins.

Slow start...

I dont like Shyamalan's style anyway, but Unbreakable's sequel becomes Unwatchable ...

I'm in SecurityGenre: Thriller/Fantasy My Score: 7.4Cast=10 Acting=7 Plot=9 Ending=9 Story=4 Intense=7 Pace=5 Suspense=7 Imagine=8 Twist=8Security guard David Dunn uses his supernatural abilities to track Kevin Wendell Crumb, a disturbed man who has twenty-four personalities.

Everything feels incredibly slow, uninspired, uninteresting, and drab.

NMS asks the viewer to suspend any rationale thought as the supporting cast surrounding the three main characters behaves so irrationally it heralds back to the cliche of people in classic horror movies that do the opposite any human being would do except the severely mentally challenged.

The slow burning tension that continues to build really draws you in and keeps you engaged.

Truly an entertaining film

However, the two best parts of this movie has to be the cinematography and James McAvoy's performance; absolutely mind blowing how he switched from one personality to another!!!

Shyamalan's best films include an element of the paranormal, the most compelling of which was "The Sixth Sense.

Shyamalan gives graphic depictions of them that are somewhat skilled, and it was entertaining to watch.

One of the worst movies I've ever seen.

Shyamalan knows how to build a huge approach to history, which for those unfamiliar with the previous films may seem tedious, but pays with an exciting final third exciting full of twists and revelations quite satisfactory and consistent with the world that history presents.

Shyamalan's POV style of action and off-screen terror--while a cliche of his cinematic style--is still useful in creating some pretty cool visuals.

Always on the edge of my seat.

Very enjoyable movie.

Most of the shots in this film are boring, and the plot itself has some major flaws.

Glass 2019 6.6 Act 1 - 6.7 Act 2 - 7.0 Act 3 - 6.2Pros Good acting Compelling moments McAvoy is impressive again Good nostalgia Liked how made you think if superhero's or not Redeemed an almost disastrous end Made the movie real and showed what really would happen in a superhero showdown Supposed to be messy and look unimpressive in fight scenes Made the situation real Diverted expectations in a good wayCons Mediocre cinematography Bad fight scenes Looked low budget at times Didn't tell the right story Stupid bad guy group Shouldn't have killed everyonePlayed with good guy and bad guy tropes in sense that every character thought they were the good guy and they all had good reasons to believe so

As with unbreakable, and Sixth Sense the build up was slow and the clues were carefully placed.

arguments from previous movies were so pointless.

I find this movie pretty enjoyable.

The story is fascinating and the movie does not drop a beat until the credits are rolled.

We already have X-men, I don;t know whether this was meant to be ironic, but it just fell very flat, uneventful and quite plainly silly.

This is a very entertaining film that perhaps reminds us not to be friends with psychopaths.

It's so predictable and utterly stupid in the last 30 minutes or so.

Glass was well written and directed just like Unbreakable and Split and also had the unexpected twist we all were expecting.

Complete waste of time.

I enjoyed the originals that helped bring this melded sequel together, "Split" and "Unbroken", but this combined sequel was uninspired and a rather boring plot.

The third & final instalment in the most unique, unexpected & unlikely of all franchises, Glass concludes M.

Also, there's plenty of suspenseful scenes and that's expected because M Night has mastered those over his career.

The final twist is, in the classic tradition of Shyamalan, what I particularly liked is the intertwining of the predictable twist and the one that takes you by surprise that makes the final perfect.

there's nothing much of Samuel l Jackson character in this movie ever because all he does he sits down in wheelchair he is sitting quiet and got his head turned sideways saying i am freaking bored of this crap.

Good actors in a dull movie.

Previously 'Unbreakable' was boring and 'Split' was interesting.

Was expecting Unbreakable + Slip = popcorn!.. instead got weird story line, actors got paid, production got noticed, an entertaining assemblage of names selling the possibility of two previous cinematic masterpieces, resulting in a script with half the oomph.

They are compelling characters built up over two movies.

it feels unfinished, leaves you a empty glass.

Finally; as I always try to do with my reviews; If you read this before watching the movie - and you are a bit like me - I hope this will adjust your expectations and make the movie even more enjoyable.

The only thing good about this third episode was James McAvoy's performance, Started so well then snowballed into long drawn out storyline with a patchwork ending.

Fails from a filmmaking standpoint but semi-ironically enjoyable .

Glass is well-thought with impressive thematic ideas regarding tragedy, trauma and acknowledgement, and meticulously crafted with powerful performances and splendid cinematography that unifies the look and feel of its predecessors, but its abrupt and underwhelming end due to confusion between cynicism and realism made it rather unsatisfying to be fondly remembered.

The movie is pretty slow and doesn't match the the previous 2.

This one on the other hand doesn't seem to have that, which makes it feel confusing at best and insulting at worst.

The supporting characters played by Anya Taylor-Joy, Spencer Treat Clark, and Charlayne Woodard, are placed in hopelessly contrived situations, behaving merely as vectors to move the story along.

Some would look at it as underwhelming, uninteresting, un-needed twist.

A little slow.

My only complaint was there were just a few pointless twists and I didn't like how they handled Bruce Willis' character in the end.

Had my doubts but definitely worth the watch.

I wouldn't waste all that money going to the cinema, though.

We feel empty at the end waiting for a surprise after credits...

Shyamalan has made a career out of weaving the supernatural with the mundane and, of his seventeen films, atleast eight have relied on twist endings.

She insisted, that the first marvelous event for David was the train accident, even though everyone knew, even the papers that back in High School days, David Dunn and his not yet wife had a car accident, and nothing happened to him there either.

The main problem with the film is that it attempts the impossible in reconciling the disparate tones of the exquisitely slow-burning deconstruction of the superhero tale in Unbreakable with the taut, horror-tinged paranoia of Split, a psychological thriller.

everything is underdeveloped, sketchy, poorly toned, boring.

First movie that I left early since....

To those looking for a gripping, vintage Shyamalan film, I enthusiastically recommend this one.

The unpredictable twists and an emotional ending will definitely hooks up the viewers.

But a compelling mcavoy gets you through to the end.

The only 3 things that really stood out as being wrong were The obligatory cameo by M Night which was pointless and kind of shameful.

What a waste of money

He is fascinating.

Really boring movie & nerve-racking .

Glass is well-thought with impressive thematic ideas regarding tragedy, trauma and acknowledgement, and meticulously crafted with powerful performances and splendid cinematography that unifies the look and feel of its predecessors, but its abrupt and underwhelming end due to confusion between cynicism and realism made it rather unsatisfying to be fondly remembered.

This is smart, unpredictable, well acted and beautifully filmed movie.

Night, intense music and an emotionally satisfying ending.

However, viewed again with anticipation of a sixth sense or unbreakable, the slow unfolding of this story to its climax then twist was...

The ticking clock featured in most of the tracks was very suspenseful and made every scene much more enjoyable.

Yawn Fest .

However, McAvoy saves the film largely by giving us one of the most unique performances of the year, and the film itself provides for a very unique and intriguing experience, that is bound to capture your attention whether you like it or not.

The end(not counting the last two minutes) was genius, if they stricked with the "before the end" the trilogy would've felt a little bit pointless, i mean, 20 years to get here, so i'm fine with the finale.

In fact I did not see the last part (1/3) because it was to boring for me.

But I found it plodding and rather silly.

Don't waste your hard earned money!

There was a time I got even bored.

The lady that plays the psychologist was super boring.

The end is so intense, loved it from start to finish.

Terrible -dont waste your time.

Everything was either boring or done horrible, I mean REALLY BAD.

I found this to be boring to the point of nearly falling asleep.

What an unexpected and awesome ending to this criminally underrated trilogy.

All three characters come together in a unique and fascinating way.

Overall it's engaging enough to be watched by interested people.

To shock us with an unexpected twist that they actually are special?

Split was awesome and better in quality but it was some slow.

It's slow and patient.

It was confusing to say the least.

Glass is fast paced watchable flick.

Thought "Unbreakable" was glacially slow?

I enjoyed the movie until the end: I expected more from Shyalaman than creating a "background force" cliche ending.

UNBRREAKABLE was a fine, inventive, and above all, exciting motion picture (up until that ill-advised final freeze frame with its docudrama captions.

Twists are supposed to be surprising, shocking, thrilling.

Even though he doesn't have much to do in the first act, Samuel Jackson shines as Mr. Glass/Elijah Prince he is super entertaining to watch and does a great job.

The ending is one of the most disappointing and unnecessarily dragged out things I have seen in a long time.

Here was another one of his beautiful, slow dramas about ordinary people discovering extraordinary gifts and learning to cope with them.


His performance's alone is worth the watch, like damn!

Worth watching.

Glass is an intriguing movie, it does something different in the superhero genre.

Save your money and wait for it on cable or Netflix .

I enjoyed it .

Unbreakable was too slow for my liking (sorry!

It had some funny moments from James but it so slow, waiting for something to happen and nothing did.

The storytelling was slow and boring, just like Unbreakable.

You need lots of patience to enjoy this, but i got bored and could not finish it.

very very slow.

Well worth watching if you are into Psychological thrillers and who doesn't like a bit of Hedwig!

There is a very slow section in the middle when all three men are imprisoned in a secure medical facility, and a psychiatrist works with them, one time with all three together in a large room, in essence trying to convince them they don't have super powers, everything can be explained by natural phenomena.

"They had so many ways to execute so many parts of the plot and the story in general, but so many defining points where just flat and boring and cheap.

The film runs really well, focusing a lot on the psychological level and providing an intriguing point of view on the world of superheroes.

Don't waste time and money for this ordinary movie.

It's just a stunning performance that I think not even the best in the business could pull off.

He is stunning as he mangaes within few seconds to change evrything about his character.

James McAvoy is a Legend..All in all its a nice movie, worth watching...

Unbreakable is a exciting movie GLASS is not, it is boring and even the twists in this film are seen a mile away.

Something fast-paced, action packed, and rife with special effects?

I forgot this movie as soon as I walked out of the theatre.

Night going back to his pretentious roots.

I was bored most of the time because the story and the characters never progress.

Night Shyamalan at his most pretentious and most la-di-da.

Jackson all make you feel as if you are inside the movie, living all the intense moments they go through as your own.

It's slow paced and dialogue heavy so don't expect a fun, exciting movie.

The movie isn't all bad, Samuel L Jackson and James McAvoy were amazing in their respective roles(even though the writing was pretty bad at times) and the final act was mostly enjoyable.

The brilliant James McAvoy is simply breathtaking in his personality change exercise, even more so than in "Split".

Really weak, even boring .

Waste of time .

I was just bored pretty much from start to finish.

A movie that keeps giving you goosebumps and sometimes a laugh, but mostly keeps you on the edge of your seat.

Worst movie I have ever watched .

A total waste of time.

His following project, however, a fascinating psychological thriller titled "Split," was the one that announced to the world a glorious comeback.

But 2nd and 3rd act a little slower than the 1st .

Mind blowing!!!!

The basic plot of Glass was good and compelling, convincing too.

Worst Movie I have ever seen .

It's fascinating how it realistically blends comic book structures into storytelling, moving along within the canons of the all-time comic book proceedings.

Was there a stunning CGI part of 45 minutes in the movie that eventually was editted out or something.

His work with Mike Gioulakis on cinematography duty gives us some great POV shots, and while the poster and trailer shot of the trio being interviewed by Paulson makes no sense visually, you buy into it because it's just a great visual that pops and would otherwise make that sequence bland.

An Absolute Borefest .

This movie was to boring for me, and I did not feel much for the story.

It was so slow moving and could have easily been condensed into a much tighter film.

A good end to the trilogy with excellent acting making up for a slow plot .

Boy Oh Boy was my wife and I completely blow away by a smart intense and action packed movie that it belw our minds.

Glass eventually builds to a climax between The Overseer and The Horde, and an unexpected plot twist which angered many moviegoers, although Price achieves his goal of revealing the existence of superhuman individuals to the world.

After the 60 minute mark things also become predictable and obvious which removes any interest or reward in viewing leaving only a hollow shell of a film.

Complete waste of time, boring and full of talking and philosophy

it's so slow to get started and then it crashes and burns badly!

The biggest draw of Glass is its distinction from other superhero films, which makes it a highly enjoyable experience throughout.

long, ponderous, and lacking a good payoff .

Snooze fest .

I found it to be boring and uninteresting for the most part.


The movie progressively loses its identity and even the usual twist that occurs in Shyamalan's clever films is too predictable to leave a mark.

It is predictable.

Night went back to his roots with this picture- in that he had an intriguing idea which he allows to fall flat before the story can realize its potential.

Well worth the watch.

The movie is strange and confusing at the same time.

The characters are the same as in the previous movies, well played by their actors and very enjoyable to watch.

While Split revealed a very exciting fact in the closing credits scene, it seems that the secret is out on Glass, Shaymalan's newest film.

The first two acts of "Glass" deliver exciting, action-packed drama, bristling with intrigue.

The Bad- too many plot holes to count, scene transitions seem desperate and confusing WTH- Unrealistic dialogue, some characters seem like an afterthought, the fightings/action scene are just absurd..If you have not seen any of the previous movies that the main characters are based on, you will find it confusing.

It was engaging, it kept me on edge, and it had twists and turns which are signature to the director that got me just like they always do.

For me, seeing my hometown on the big screen was really quite exciting, even if there has been an uptick of Philly movies recently.


The result was disappointing, boring and a total mess.

Too boring .

Two-thirds pointless, one-third stupid.

don't waste your money.

There is thousands of those in the internet, far more controversial and entertaining.

But it is all a slow very long build-up to something.

Personally, I thought that we were going to get an in-depth look into Elijah's character as we did with Unbreakable for David and the different personalities of McAvoy's characters in Split, but we ended up with pointless hospital jargon about comic book heroes and fake superhumans.

It takes it's time and even when it gets going, it's a slow burn that raises questions.

But overall, this was a wholly enjoyable movie that had my brother and I discussing it the drive home.

Very clever and thoroughly enjoyable .

Overacted pretentious BS .

The fights that were there were entertaining.


I actually had to watch it 3 times as I literally fell asleep watching it every time.

Even the action was boring.

Jackson and Bruce Willis that make this movie worth watching and something to remember.

It was mind blowing, Epic, Thrilling, Terrifyingly perfection, Masterpiece with Score and music that blows your mind.

This movie veers from being amazingly boring to plain idiotic.

And yes, the inane dialogue was just that, pretentious, pointless & a pandering mess.

The fascinating central triumvirate of larger-than-life characters is integral to this: James McAvoy excels once again portraying 20 heterogenous characters, switching effortlessly from the excited lisp of 9 year old 'Hedwig' to the domineering matriarch 'Patricia'.

This was full of suspense thriller and confusion.

Finally, despite my complains about Glass, this is actually enjoyable into extent fresh take on the superhero/comic-book movie.

It was very enjoyable though.

What a waste of time.

The actors definitely makes Glass worth watching, they believed in the movie.


A decade of gaining fans trust back all to squander it for a static slow character study?

What a twist at the end, totally mind blowing.

Waste of time.

After an hour, I was beginning to get bored, mainly due to the slow pacing.

In reality it's pretty much a confusion and disorder of two genre that didn't know what it was.

Worst movie in my life .

Some scenes could've included more information (I don't want to spoil anything), but instead we get little pieces of information and development, and it makes the movie move too slow in the middle, where some rewriting could've taken 10/15 minutes of the middle and make the movie a more fun watch.

That was unexpected.

The apparent plot twist in the end was predictable and had me caring not a single bit as I was just waiting for the movie to end.

Others will think of it, as boring.

But this time I felt my blood boiling as every scene become abstract and disjointed.

What a tedious introduction, huh?

Predictable, stupid-to some extent, felt again, like a re-heated dinner.

Ok storyline but a bit boring, I've seen all 3 movies now.

I enjoyed it very much and would definetley watch again.

The action, when it's there, is pretty entertaining and well done.

Did not like it, it was boring, and not because I expected a super-cheesy super hero movie, I'm not even a fan of those.

Also really dull.

Very boring movie and soooo silly Very boring movie and soooo silly Very boring movie and soooo silly Very boring movie and soooo silly

), the story is intriguing, and the ending is exactly what your typical superhero film isn't.


But this movie is just hyping up to a climax that never happens, the movie is slow and boring.

It will likely prove too slow for those who only liked Split, and too incoherent for those who only liked UnbreakableIt also suffers from an ending burdened with lumbering twists that feel unearned and in need of some more foreshadowing.

Night Shyamalan gives us an intriguing superhero series that is unlike any other.

It's a great concept let down by poor writing, low-budget execution, and a repetitive, uninteresting storyline.

Boring and anticlimactic.

Extremely lazy writing, horrible directing, just a complete waste of time.

Thanks, this is a favorite and very thought proviking story that is entertaining and not as scary as Split.

the reason that i enjoyed it was the superb cast specially James McAvoy with his stunning and mind blowing acting as kevin wendell crumb who have 24 personalities which he played beautifully.

While it's true that the last act of this third installment is insanely brilliant, off-kilter, twisted, as everything surrounding the filmmaker, and cinematically fabulous, act one and two are practically a mess, a deadening pileup of weird decisions that instead of infusing new perspectives into the nowadays suffocating superhero genre, indirectly undermines the exciting plot threads and the style/artistic exercises of the two previous prequels.

Glass starts like an intriguing supernatural thriller with bleak atmosphere as three men with mysterious powers encounter at a mental institution.

This film is kind of boring, which is a shame because Unbreakable and Split are good films.

Glass, Shyamalan again delivers a movie with incredible twists, fantastic cinematography and a great script, that surprises and give a more than satisfying ending, to this fantastic trilogy that shyamalan has created, the second act feels a little boring, for me to give my perfect grading to this film.

I expected entertaining, cliche action.

Don't go to watch this, don't waste your money and time.

As we get into the third act, things actually become rather enjoyable - probably because things of note are occurring again; Willis doesn't have much to say here and McAvoy and Jackson are, at least, trying.

James McAvoy acting is the only reason I did not stop after 30 minutes, this movie is extremely slow with payoff and some of the dumbest decisions by smart people will you see.

Willis is just plain bored, and Jackson is...

Very enjoyable though not as impactful as it should've been.

Of Shyamalan's trilogy ('Unbreakable' in 2000 and 'Split' in 2018) this is the least smart or enjoyable.

One of the worst movies ever made.

Boring .

But the movie leading up to that is pretty entertaining.

While their powers are later proven to be real, the encroachment of the mundane makes the story intriguing.

It starts out appearing to be a sequel for two films that actually worked, but it turns into a weird, pointless drama about a shrink.

It's the worst movie from the trilogy.

Once the characters get to the asylum and are all in the same place, the film comes to a fault for over an hour with boring discussion after boring monologue flooding the screen.

"Glass" is a tedious and boring film to watch.....

An unexpected end and the last lines of samuel tell the whole truth

This part is both brilliant and boring: the brilliance is in the way it questions all the beliefs built in the previous two films and in the first act of this very one, leading both the characters and us watching to wonder if we weren't just being delusional.

This movie spends so long trying to convince characters and audience alike that there's nothing special about our three leads that we're left to wonder if there's anything special about the movie itself, and that draws focus away from four very strong and enjoyable performances in an admittedly lackluster story

The first half of the film gave us action packed reimmergence of Bruce Willis.

The story is very slow and, basicaly, the whole movie looks to live off of James's different personalities.

It really ruins the first set up that was quite engaging.

Gotta say, Bruce Willis is a nice fan treat, but his actions were slow and low.

It's good to note that also like a lot of Shyamalan movies, the pacing is slow, allowing the cold tone to blossom.

This was truly a boring flick, and nothing exciting happened the entire movie.

Wow what an amazing one it's Soo unique and different and the acting was so strong and moreover a strong script to chose and act.. Preferably a best connected movie of Split series watch out for a thrilling one

but confusing.

This is a much slower-paced and more Drama/Thriller than action movie (although there is some action here and there).

This was, for me, more enjoyable than Split, much more like Unbreakable.

January is a month for people to see the awards season films they didn't make it to in December and for that reason, it's notoriously the worst movie of the year.

Thrilling .

If u r looking for a movie that u can really get into and one that keeps u on the edge of u'r seat then don't bother.

Left feeling dissatisfied, was quite boring, script wasn't quite right.

Of course I knew the rumors from yore that Unbreakable was intended as a trilogy; but as the years went on and nothing happened, I figured the projected had been abandoned.

An unpredictable and good ending to a long trilogy.

Much of the problem was the rather predictable action occurring in the hospital with little visual variety.

The pace is so slow laced with copious dialogues.

And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown".

James' performance was amazing but the movie was so slow and boring that I left early.

The film is a mess, from the beginning you see that this is a film that thinks it's super profound and smart, even though the writing is far worse than the writing in Unbreakable and Split, the pacing is incredibly slow, Bruce Willis clearly doesn't care about the film and it really shows in his acting.

Slow moving and silly.

Night Shyamalan just makes dull movies.

Given that, if you're really bored and want to get angry at a movie then this would be a good one to watch

How Glass (2019) brings the stories and characters together from Unbreakable (2000) and Split (2016) is fascinating.

Boring, had to struggle to stay awake .

Unexpected twist.

On one hand, it sucks that after this many years, David Dunn is dragged face down through the mud, then drowned in A PUDDLE!

To understand the most prodigious of his storytelling machinations, we have to go back in time, exactly when "Unbreakable," a modest, riveting blend of drama, suspense and thriller, starring two of the most beloved movie stars of the 80's/90's, opened long before Christopher Nolan's "Batman" trilogy officially kicked off the modern superhero genre, this being also one of the last lucky offerings before "The Last Airbender" and "After Earth" destroyed his reputation.

Night Shyamalan truly did try his hardest to create a suspenseful, tense and powerful climax to the trilogy.

Entertaining throughout...

It was very fun to watch Mr. Glass and David Dunn back on the big screen again, and especially exciting to see them interacting with Kevin and his many personalities.

Nothing happened, most of the stuff was very predictable.

Once again we aren't trusted with being capable to understand things without someone reiterating them to us, burdening once more the dialogues with over-exposition and, well, boring us a little.

It was great seeing movie 1st time around, but seeing it again was kinda dull.

Intense at First .

I like the theme, but I thought it was a bit boring at times.

Great pacing from the movie as well, but boring storytelling.

Repetative, meandering, confusing and definitely a waste of time.

Totally enjoyable, James made the movie with his many characters.

With this cast, make a completely empty and meaningless film - we must still try.

As I had watched Split and Unbreakable, the whole Mental Institution concept seemed pointless because I already knew about there powers and what they were capable of.

However it's the unique mix of these stories from the pre released films brought together in this informal trilogy and their unexpected relations mixed with a modern day classic comic book style film, that I firmly believes has brought him back to that high standard.

Bold, Well-acted, Often Entertaining, Messy .

The action is poorly done and very disjointed.

Unexpected !.

Past that, the movie is rather boring.

This was a long, drawn-out homage to comic book heroes lacking both substance and imagination.

Night movies, it's anything but a predictable superhero film, and really delivers on the analysis of how the world might REALLY react to the possibility of "superpowers.

really this feels like a ending that let people down this film was just useless a lot of times and i think M Night is a overrated film director of all time the movie i loved really first one in franchise Unbreakable i loved that movie to death then 17 years later we had a bad rubbish boring pointless split with James McAvoy a spin off sequel witch is based on Unbreakable, and i hated actor James McAvoy a lot i think he is boring actor of all time i hated him i think in role of him people a lot The Horde: A twenty-seven year old who is a former Philadelphia Zoo employee with 23 different personalities whose body chemistry changes with each personality, resulting in a 24th personality known as "The Beast i am like whatever he doesn't scare me i think he is annoyest character in movie franchise of all time i hated split i thought this would be better movie in franchise, but this ended not to well i don't understand why this got a 37% rotten tomatoes i still don't understand why it hasn't got worst movies in franchise ever just like with another movies.

So by now, you've watched all the previous movies leading up to this and you're confronted with a bunch of pointless dialogue until...

Fun and entertaining .

The characters and acting are fantastic - especially James McAvoy, who's entertaining as ever in his deliverance of multiple personalities.

You know it was boring!

For me this was the most thrilling and engaging movie of the trilogy.

The beginning is all Split, complete with kidnapped children and McAvoy's intense changeability.

Boring .

It's similar in structure to its predecessor, Unbreakable - it's first act sets up what comes next, and is slow yet suspenseful, the second act is when the action starts, and the third act goes by in a snap.

After an hour and a half of boring psychoanalysis, and the beast constantly changing from one character to another, I got fed up with the film, and the ending was appalling.

man this writing of film is confusing as hell, Kevin who killed her father and her friends she cry's about him and cares about him ?

I don't recommend it, though Unbreakable and Split are at least worth watching.

I saw Glass earlier this year and enjoyed it.

I waste a couple of hours of my life .

But Split seemed interesting and meanwhile the trailers for Glass were coming out, and they were so exciting I had to watch them for closure.

The film will have commercial success since people prefer empty superhero flicks over Shyamalan's more intellectual works.

and Samuel l Jackson looks bored, tried saying get me out of this piece of crap movie he is looking at camera like he is bored as hell not well.

Everything M Night touches is just tedious and painful.

Also the movie goes to hell in the third act, and we get to see a very confusing plot twist which is definitely not good.

In the end i wanted to end this torture, there were people who were yawning.

Boring conclusion to a boring trilogy .

Painfully slow and delivers a nothing burger .

the storyline was very well created and the return of the charactors made this movie very enjoyable.

His performance's alone is worth the watch, like damn.

Tedious .


Slow paced, good acting, some weaker than other scripts.

He and I both agree that it's just about the worst movie we've ever seen.

The movie is intriguing and entertaining.

I fail to see how it was clever or that there was a twist, it was predictable and disappointing.