Hamlet (1990) - Drama

Hohum Score

59

Bearable

Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, finds out that his uncle Claudius killed his father to obtain the throne, and plans revenge.

IMDB: 6.7
Director: Franco Zeffirelli
Stars: Mel Gibson, Glenn Close
Length: 135 Minutes
PG Rating: PG
Reviews: 14 out of 96 found boring (14.58%)

One-line Reviews (44)

Indeed, most cast give breathtaking performances.

I found it, in the hands of such fine actors, fascinating.

One note to those out there who think Shakespeare is wordy and tedious: try writing the same situations the Bard wrote, your version won't hold a candle!!

A truly stunning scene.

On the other hand, while it is a long play with much complexity and so forth(therefore a slow unfolding pace is necessary) there are some scenes that do come about as too drawn-out and laborious.

I know there were people who fell asleep in my lit class when I took this course ten years ago.

He's chopped and rearranged and interpolated the play into a very compelling story, really taking advantage of the resources old Will didn't have.

beautiful cinematography, perfect direction, and some truly breathtaking acting combine with a shortened story to bridge the gap between modern cinema and Shakespeare...

However, like the play, the movie was slow and at times tiresome.

Yet although Christopher De Vore's cut down screenplay was not, as has been said before, grassroots Shakespeare, it was most definitely entertaining.

By cutting so much and by inserting his own additions the director has essentially leveled all the characters and make them much more dull and single-faceted.

The play is really long and repetitive, so I think this movie did a fantastic job of really getting the meat.

But at the end of the film, when I left the theater and knowing that the principal characters died, it was then that out of curiosity I began to be intrigued by the plot of the story and say "Hey, this is interesting".

Hamlet Movie ReviewThe movie "Hamlet," released in January 18, 1991, shows director Franco Zeffirelli's selections of Shakespeare's original Hamlet and reflects one intriguing possibility of the text.

So here you have weak, flat and uninteresting characters in a script that can only be described as a jumbled perversion of the original.

Mel Gibson's representation of the son Hamlet, however, is the best and is simply stunning.

The problem, I think, is that the movie is just kind of slow and some scenes are a bit unnecessary.

Hamlet comes off as a dumb, bewildered hothead, which makes his more intelligent lines (and this is largely thanks to Mel Gibson's mediocre acting) seem out of place and dull.

Glen Close' Gertrude is utterly gripping.

Not as good as Branagh's, but still enjoyable .

Although this version was only 2 hours 20 minutes approximately, it was more boring in parts than Branagh's was.

A bit slow, to be honest .

If, prior to the release of this film, anybody had told me Mel Gibson could pull off one of the most entertaining performances of Hamlet on film, I would have laughed.

Like all teenagers I was forced to read "Hamlet" in high school, and like all teenagers I found it to be a total bore.

Gibson gives the strength and all the intense and the fury that the role needs..Under the strict and charming guidance of Zeffirelli the film is excellent.

) But it's a truly entertaining film version of the most spectacular play ever written and it deserves credit for that.

The result is a slow, confused, boring film which will put those new to Shakespeare off Shakespeare instantly!

During the course of the film, I found that this film was incredibly "draggy" and hard to follow in terms of its language spoken and the pace that it was going.

But the fact is, he did make this film, and his performance is unpretentious and very entertaining.

Polonius was especially enjoyable: "Neither a borrower nor a lender be...

The costumes, even of the royal or aristocratic characters, are dull and subdued; Zeffirelli seems to have intended them to reflect the mood of the characters in the play.

In this case, however, the interior scenes are dull and claustrophobic; the predominant colour is the grey of the castle walls.

So you can imagine my surprise when, bored out of my wits one rainy afternoon, I found myself browsing the video collection in our school library when, low and behold, I found this version of the play.

This interpretation of Hamlet was so focused on telling us about Hamlet, that it left all other characters flat and uninteresting.

The set is purely filled with melancholy agony and intense which are the very words that Gibson portrays Hamlet.

This dreary, cold, almost hostile setting establishes the correct mood for the play and indeed parallels Hamlet's frame of mind.

Some of the story was a little slow moving and some of the dialogue could have been updated slightly.

Like many people, I'm used to seeing Mel Gibson as the tough Mad Max and the humorous Sergeant Riggs, but he gives an intense performance as hamlet.

It's worth watching it in whatever format is available.

He foregrounds the complex with the casting of Glenn Close, but her performance is too dull to really draw it out and the production thus suffers from a lack of cohesiveness from the Oedipus complex's seeming as a side-plot involving the main character and thus only over-complicating matters rather than informing us about Hamlet.

I'm not sure what there was about it, but I saw it on the big screen, and it was so breathtaking to me, I thought my heart would stop.

I think that this was the first film version of a Shakespeare play that I watched and I really enjoyed it.

The result - a highly entertaining movie.

Entertaining - Do not compare it to Branagh .