Age of Uprising: The Legend of Michael Kohlhaas (2013) - Drama, History

Hohum Score

97

Hohummer

In the 16th century in the Cévennes, a horse dealer by the name of Michael Kohlhaas leads a happy family life. When a lord treats him unjustly, he raises an army and puts the country to fire and sword in order to have his rights restored.

IMDB: 6.1
Director: Arnaud des Pallières
Stars: Mads Mikkelsen, Mélusine Mayance
Length: 122 Minutes
PG Rating: N/A
Reviews: 13 out of 35 found boring (37.14%)

One-line Reviews (37)

Maybe the story is well known enough in Europe that it makes sense to them, but I think even a story we know in the US (such as Abraham Lincoln), you'd at least say who is who, what is happening, etc. Anyway, it is explained a bit a little more than halfway through, but it should have come much sooner and it gets a bit confusing again.

Slow, raw film with great ending .

Visually stunning, but oh so slow .

A slow, ponderous, anticlimactic movie.

If you're a thinking person who enjoy very good actors, a movie that travels at a pace that reflects an actual story about human beings, social justice and conflicts, irony and dilemma, the stuff of life, this is a powerful and intense drama.

The problem with AGE OF UPRISING is that it goes out of its way to be as slow and arty as is humanly possibly.

Slow, ponderous, anticlimactic .

There's an hour's worth of plotting and incident dragged out to two hours, and boy, does it drag.

Cinematography was stunning at times but it also often went too artsy which made it hard to see what was going on and in the end made the scenes ineffective.

This movie is so slow, you can watch it in 2x and it still will seem slow.

It does move with a very slow pace and it is a movie about values.

However, I was slowly involved in rough, severe atmosphere of the movie, and I really enjoyed it in the end.

Its very confusing.

Now, flat and boring.

Now, I do appreciate all of the lovely scenery, and having seen this in high definition I can say it's a visually stunning film.

Pondering the ethics of rebellion, justice and loyalty can make for a good movie - think of 'A Man For All Seasons', for example - but this one is leaden and dull.

In this day and age of fast scenes and bloody gore, apparently this movie left some critics calling it dull and lifeless.

Each scene plays out for far too long, and everything seems to be deliberately subdued and painstakingly detailed.

Picturesque and pretentious with little substance.

For some dull and for some powerful .

If you know the book on which this film is based, it's easy to follow, but the plot is slow, disjointed, and leaves too much to the imagination of the viewer.

So, this is not an action movie, but it works your adrenaline up by letting you interpret the understatements.

The film is slow, and I mean s-l-o-w.

Slow, dreary, boring and not worth watching .

The run is slow, the environment is ugly, there are a few twists, thus I started to focus on acting very soon.

The film is tedious and extremely bereft of life when it should have been inspiring and exciting.

The scenery and the sets were quite breathtaking.

However it is a well acted,photographed and intriguing movie.

Pointless .

Surely one of these two sequences is repetitive and weren't they out of order?

Lots of "meaningful and intense" stares, sprinkled with bits and pieces of pompous dialogue.

All in all, I found the editing to be quite perplexing which makes the pacing of the movie feel rather slow.

The themes of property rights and faith brought up by the script were interesting, but it was too contrived and pedantic.

Slow Burner .

Kind of reminds me of Bresson's Lancelot du Lac (but not in a good way, more like tedious and boring way): http://www.

If you think I am kidding this is exactly what I did after 10 minutes of being bored to death.

I concur with many of you that this movie was way to long, slow and anticlimactic.